[arin-ppml] efficient utilization != needs basis
Michael Richardson wrote:
>>>>>> "David" == David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> writes:
> David> So, a question I have for you and something I'm not 100%
> David> decided on would ULA-Central or ULA-Global be an acceptable
> David> alternative?
> I was a supporter of ULA-Central, before, I thought that there was
> another proposal from Paul Vixie. I can't find it right now, so just so
> that everyone knows what is being talked about:
Vixie's proposal was ULA-Global
> I was never clear if ULA-Central would include a whois database and
> proper delegation of reverse DNS.
So would you prefer ULA-Central or ULA-Global type solution or a
solution based on Global Unicast address space.
Personally, I'm leaning toward Global Unicast address space.
> >> Proposal 103 gives out globally unique (but not routable) /48s to
> >> anyone that asks, and that is enough to get these other networks
> >> off the ground to the point where one can understand just how
> >> much space you really do need.
> David> While I agree this would be possible with PP#103, I believe
> David> it is possible to provide these addresses without such a
> David> massive change to IPv6 policy structure.
> I would welcome such a proposal, but until I see it, I'm not prepared to
> give up on 103.
I'll get it out soon.
David Farmer Email:farmer at umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952