[arin-ppml] Does Moore's law help with routing table growth?
On 12/22/2009 8:31 PM, Michel Py wrote:
>> Scott Leibrand wrote:
>> If we just raised the prices of ASNs, multihoming with
>> private ASNs would become a lot more popular.
> We may be agreeing on this, but I feel the limitations of my English
You hide any such limitation well. :-)
> I must have missed a step; how does multihoming with private ASNs
Our mutual customer runs BGP with both of us, uses a private ASN to run
BGP, and announces both of us his route. We both implement the
remote-private-as command (or equivalent) to strip his private ASN from
the path before announcing it to our providers and peers. As a result,
the BGP table contains the route with two different origin ASNs: mine
and yours. That's ugly, but it doesn't really break anything.
> Besides, ASNs are not in short supply, slots in the routing table are
> problematic. How would raising the price of ASNs would prevent people
> from announcing a gazillion prefixes from one ASN?
Exactly correct. Which is why any viable method would have to monetize
the routing slots directly, for example by tier 1 transit providers
charging their customers per route announced, and adding deaggregation
ratio requirements to their existing traffic ratio requirements in their
peering agreements with each other. Which won't happen unless the rate
of growth of the routing table becomes a much more significant problem
than it is today, or router capacity growth dramatically slows.