[arin-ppml] questions about AC decision re: 103.

>>>>> "Member" == Member Services <info at> writes:
    Member>   103. Change IPv6 Allocation Process 104. Multiple Discrete
    Member> Networks for proposal 103

    Member> The AC stated, "The ARIN Advisory Council determined to
    Member> abandon Policy Proposal #103: Change IPv6 Allocation
    Member> Process.  While the AC perceives there is significant
    Member> support for major revisions to IPv6 policy, the AC could not
    Member> support this proposal in its current form. The majority of
    Member> the AC felt the only way they could move this proposal
    Member> forward would have been to modify it in ways not perceived
    Member> as compatible with the author's original intent.  The AC
    Member> would like to work with the author and the rest of community
    Member> to develop future IPv6 policy proposals.

Can we get a clear statement of:
    1) what does the AC feel they need to do?
    2) what does the AC feel the author's intent is?
    3) is the "classful" nature of the proposal a sticking point?

]       He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr at |device driver[
   Kyoto Plus: watch the video <>
	               then sign the petition.