[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 101: Multihomed initial allocation criteria
cja at daydream.com wrote:
> Hi everyone...
> I have seen virtually no comments regarding this policy. I can't
> imagine there is a lack of opinion out there...
> Happy Holidays!
I support this proposal, even as I suspect its a no-op, and even as I
have the following reservations, since now is not the time to keep a
tight rein nor is it the time to let them drag on the ground.
At 16 /48's with potentially one /48 per customer, thats a significantly
lower bar than with IPv4 multihoming requirements, where a /24 per
customer raises some eyebrows.
I believe that efficiency and allocation guidelines need to be
reconciled with a less ipv4-centric viewpoint.
Judging efficiency by the # of assigned /48 basically penalizes
organizations who choose to not follow allocation recommendations of /48
per site/customer and rewards those who disregard the /56 and any other
bit-points in between /64 and /48.