[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 101: Multihomed initial allocation criteria
I have seen virtually no comments regarding this policy. I can't imagine
there is a lack of opinion out there...
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Member Services <info at arin.net> wrote:
> ARIN received the following policy proposal and is posting it to the
> Public Policy Mailing List (PPML) in accordance with Policy Development
> This proposal is in the first stage of the Policy Development Process.
> ARIN staff will perform the Clarity and Understanding step. Staff does
> not evaluate the proposal at this time, their goal is to make sure that
> they understand the proposal and believe the community will as well.
> Staff will report their results to the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) within
> 10 days.
> The AC will review the proposal at their next regularly scheduled
> meeting (if the period before the next regularly scheduled meeting is
> less than 10 days, then the period may be extended to the subsequent
> regularly scheduled meeting). The AC will decide how to utilize the
> proposal and announce the decision to the PPML.
> In the meantime, the AC invites everyone to comment on the proposal on
> the PPML, particularly their support or non-support and the reasoning
> behind their opinion. Such participation contributes to a thorough
> vetting and provides important guidance to the AC in their deliberations.
> Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
> The ARIN Policy Development Process can be found at:
> Mailing list subscription information can be found
> at: https://www.arin.net/mailing_lists/
> Member Services
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
> ## * ##
> Policy Proposal 101: Multihomed initial allocation criteria
> Proposal Originator: Chris Grundemann
> Proposal Version: 1
> Date: 30 October 2009
> Proposal type: modify
> Policy term: permanent
> Policy statement:
> Modify item number 4 under section 220.127.116.11. Initial allocation criteria
> to the following:
> 4. be an existing, known ISP in the ARIN region or have a plan for
> making at least 200 end-site assignments to other organizations within
> 5 years or, if multihomed, demonstrate the efficient utilization of a
> minimum contiguous or noncontiguous /44 (sixteen /48s) from an
> The bar for obtaining initial IPv4 allocations is lower for those ISPs
> which are multi-homed, it stands to reason that it also be lower in
> IPv6. Since efficient utilization is based on the use of /48s, this
> policy would effectively allow any ISP with 15 active customers (with
> one /48 each and one /48 for the ISPs own network) to receive an initial
> allocation of an IPv6 /32 from ARIN. I think this is a better approach
> than removing or lowering the end-site assignment requirement for _all_
> ISPs while still providing more open access to IPv6.
> Timetable for implementation: immediate
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...