[arin-ppml] SWIPs & IPv6
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> "John" == John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> writes:
>> ... So, for LIRS that want to pee all over themselves, well then
>> don't file SWIPS. In fact I ENCOURAGE IT STRONGLY because then
>> all I have to do is null-route your ENTIRE AS, I don't even have
>> to waste CPU cycles blocking just the obnoxious traffic from
John> Ted -
John> Under this philosophical approach, what would ARIN's
John> responsibilities be with respect to an organization which
John> files no SWIP's and runs no rwhois service?
ARIN already clearly delegates to them, so that's done.
John> More specifically, if an organization is willing to accept the
John> incident/security response obligations implied by not showing
John> sub-delegations, is that "acceptable" until/unless the
John> organization needs to show utilization for an additional
John> address block? (If so, wouldn't it be best to update the NRPM
John> to reflect this "optionality" of SWIPs/rwhois data?)
If an organization wants to be responsible for their customers' camel
porn, then... they can call themselves (content-responsible) enterprises
rather than (common-carrier) ISPs.
I guess it's a feature of IPv6 that it enables organizations to not be
network neutral, if they do not call themselves networks!
(I wish that .net had been delegated to IANA/ARIN back in the early
1990s.. No ASN/-ARIN handle, no foo.net...)
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr at sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----