[arin-ppml] Did 2008-6 provide what Board needed?
On 14 Apr 2009 John Schnizlein wrote:
> Should the start be calculated from exhaustion of IANA's free pool?
> Recall that IANA's exhaustion will happen sooner than otherwise by the
> policy to disperse the last five /8s among the RIRs as soon as the
> normal allocations reach the last 5. Actual exhaustion of free IPv4
> addresses happens when the RIR exhausts its pool. Various proposals
> focussed on fairness toward the end might slow consumption of the
> RIR's pool still more.
Actually further done in my email I think I deal with that, at
least for my safety trigger and the automatic extension. I
reference NRPM 10.4.2.1 and 10.4.2.2 which is where the /8s
for the RIR are reserved and handed out. However, I didn't
correct for that when basing the projected run on from mid-
2011, on picking the specfic dates.
Does projection on potaroo.net, account for the new global
policy: "End Policy for IANA IPv4 allocations to RIRs" and the
last /8 that it reserves for each RIR?
Could you add that? Or is the a different projection that
accounts for that you can point me to?
> Your goal of providing less uncertainty is a good one. Let's not
> arrange a transfer policy experiment to expire just after the lack of
> free addresses makes it more important.
David Farmer Email:
farmer at umn.edu
Office of Information Technology
Networking & Telecomunication Services
University of Minnesota Phone: 612-626-
2218 University Ave SE Cell:
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 FAX: 612-626-