[arin-ppml] 2008-6: Emergency Transfer Policy for IPv4 Addresses
Milton L Mueller
mueller at syr.edu
Thu Oct 9 12:39:00 EDT 2008
- Previous message: [arin-ppml] 2008-6: Emergency Transfer Policy for IPv4 Addresses
- Next message: [arin-ppml] 2008-6: Emergency Transfer Policy for IPv4 Addresses
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> On Oct 6, 2008, at 9:27 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > > > and this is not a problem if you get the space from an rir, only if > > you buy it on an open market. cool! > > > > randy > > That's right Randy. To recap from last week, what makes routing keep > working under the current paradigm? > > 1. CIDR -- which provides the basic tools. Which still exists if there are transfers... > 2. Top-level aggregation -- which the RIR community-system provided, > and kept flexible over time as technology improved and RIR community > practices changed. Which still exists if there are transfers... > 3. Filtering -- which was/is only commercially feasible because of the > top-level aggregation made possible by the RIR community-system. Which still exists if there are transfers... > 4. Open entry for new routing service providers, which the arms-length Which becomes more limited due to ipv4 scarcity with or without transfers C'mon Tom, Randy nailed it.
- Previous message: [arin-ppml] 2008-6: Emergency Transfer Policy for IPv4 Addresses
- Next message: [arin-ppml] 2008-6: Emergency Transfer Policy for IPv4 Addresses
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list