[ppml] Securities Act 15 U.S.C. 77b(a)(1)
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Tue Mar 11 20:46:10 EDT 2008
- Previous message: [ppml] Securities Act 15 U.S.C. 77b(a)(1)
- Next message: [ppml] Securities Act 15 U.S.C. 77b(a)(1)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > P.S. In case you hadn't noticed, I am not a lawyer. > > Then why are you playing one on TV...I mean ppml.... Really? Did I give you legal advice? Did I claim to be a lawyer? Or did I suggest that it would be a wise move to consult expert legal advice in a specific area of law which sounds like it may cover the buying and selling of contracts which bear the right to use a specific IP address block. > I am also not a lawyer, but see nothing in the definition > that comes close to what I see being proposed in the transfer > policy update proposal. During the discussion, others have claimed that the transfer policy is just the first step to enabling an IP address trading market. If such a market would attract SEC regulation, I think that it is a good idea to find out what are the boundaries to ARIN policy, assuming that we do not want to give up our industry self-regulatory regime. If legal advice from a lawyer specializing in SEC Regulations and Title 15 Chapter 2, tells us that there are some real limits and we are close to overstepping them, then people might want to reject the transfer policy entirely and take a different tack. For instance, organizations with a surplus of IPv4 addresses could be required to return them to ARIN, and ARIN could continue to allocate on a needs basis with first-come first-served to decide any supply issues. > And, ARIN Counsel, who is a lawyer has already weighed in on > this in an informal way suggesting a similar opinion that the > SEC is unlikely to take interest. I am assuming, that since ARIN Counsel has been retained for many years by a non-profit organization, that said counsel's expertise is in corporate and general law, not in the specialized area of the SEC and financial markets. To date I have seen no indication that ARIN has consulted with a lawyer whose area of expertise is precisely financial markets. There has been a lot of discussion in which several participants have suggested that the transfer policy is the first step to enabling a market in contracts bearing the right of use of a specific IP address range. Like the New York Stock Exchange or the Chicago commodities markets or NASDAQ etc, etc. That is not ordinary corporate law since ordinary companies do not directly participate in the financial markets, they retain specialists (pension funds, stock brokers, banks) to do it on their behalf. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message: [ppml] Securities Act 15 U.S.C. 77b(a)(1)
- Next message: [ppml] Securities Act 15 U.S.C. 77b(a)(1)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list