[ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
Bill Darte
BillD at cait.wustl.edu
Wed Mar 5 14:54:28 EST 2008
- Previous message: [ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
- Next message: [ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > Raul Echeberria wrote: > >> Without some form of transfer policy, ARIN simply becomes > irrelevant > >> as address consumers go to the "black" market in order to > meet their > >> requirements. > > > > Or they adopt IPv6. > > Which are the factors that will make take one decision or > other is an > > interesting discussion. > > > Don't forget that, until the entire rest of the world adopts > IPv6, organizations doing so will still need IPv4 > addresses/connectivity to run dual-stack or some sort of (yet > to be standardized or > commercialized) protocol translation. If nothing else, a > legitimate market for IPv4 transfers will ensure that new > entrants can get the IPv4 addresses they need to support > whatever technology they choose to use to communicate with > the rest of the IPv4 Internet. > > -Scott Well, we'd like to think that such market would 'ensure' that they would get the addresses they 'need'. I'd say that this may be probable, but uncertain.... bd
- Previous message: [ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
- Next message: [ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list