[ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Tue Mar 4 14:13:27 EST 2008
- Previous message: [ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
- Next message: [ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Generally, the expectation is that the listing > service data will be as open and public as possible > with the intent of allowing as much information as > possible to potential transferors/transferees prior > to engaging in the process. Will this be a real-time listing service to minimise the risk that an insider would have access to data about available blocks before the general public? If so, then that is considered to be an OTC (Over-The-Counter) bulletin board and it may be subject to SEC regulation, depending on just what is being traded. It seems to me that the IP address contracts being traded might be considered to be some kind of OTC derivative. Since the traders in this market would not be considered to be sophisticated investors by the SEC, this could fall under one of the Congressional Acts that regulate trading under the jurisdiction of the SEC. > Nobody present at the BoF was prepared or qualified > to speak on behalf of ARIN from a legal perspective. Is ARIN Counsel qualified to speak about the legal ramifications as far as the SEC are concerned? Not all lawyers deal with all areas of law. > There were several questions about likely efficacy and > whether this policy would actually accomplish anything. Indeed! > Leo Bicknell made the point that without this policy or > something like it, the world becomes set in stone after IPv4 > runout. That's funny, I though that change was the only constant in our universe. Now you want to convince me that IPv4 runout is such a momentous event that it will change the laws of the universe!? > Haves have and have nots have not and there's no way > for that to change. Companies will build out IPv6 networks and eventually begin retiring their IPv4 addresses. And as far as the "have nots" are concerned, there is no law preventing them from simply carving up 126/8, a large block that was given to a Japanese cable company. Or any other large block that seems relatively unused on the North American Internet. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message: [ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
- Next message: [ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list