[ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
John Curran
jcurran at istaff.org
Thu Feb 28 01:09:43 EST 2008
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 11:59 PM -0500 2/27/08, Martin Hannigan wrote: >The AC should not be undervalued. Still, I think that the >AC, as a whole, should reconsider putting forth policy. >Bottom up policy shouldn't come from the middle. As long as independent proposals get a fair shake, I see no reason for the AC not to put forth proposals. They are, after all, elected based on their knowledge of addressing and related issues. In this particular case, the ARIN Board asked the AC to consider implications of IPv4 transfer policies and make a proposal for discussion purposes. /John
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list