[ppml] IPv4 transfers
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Mon Feb 18 09:23:09 EST 2008
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv4 Resource Distribution After IANA Free Pool Exhaustion -- ARIN AC BoF
- Next message: [ppml] No Webcast of IPv4 Free Pool BoF today
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
If IPv4 transfers are allowed but in a way that involves ARIN, then IPv4 addresses that are currently used in the ARIN region can only be obtained by organizations that are also in the ARIN region. ARIN has a little more address space under it than APNIC and the RIPE NCC: 29 /8s for ARIN, 26 for APNIC and the RIPE NCC, LACNIC has 6 and Afrinic 2. However, if we include the legacy /8 space the picture becomes very different: of the 44 /8s that are allocated/assigned (from the delegation records on the RIR FTP servers) APNIC and RIPE both have one in their database, ARIN the other 42. For the space that's under "various registries" (mostly legacy class B), ARIN governs 28.91 /8s, RIPE 6.91 and the other RIRs put together 4.21 /8s. Adding it all up: ARIN: 29 + 42 + 28.91 = 99.91 /8s, 1676 million addresses RIPE NCC: 26 + 1 + 6.91 = 33.91 /8s, 569 million addresses ARPNIC: 26 + 1 + 3.28 = 30.28 /8s, 508 million addresses LACNIC: 6 + 0.57 = 6.57 /8s, 110 million addresses AfriNIC: 2 + 0.36 = 2.36 /8s, 40 million addresses (After I disabled IPv6 I was able to visit the ARIN website and) I had a look at policy proposal 2007-27. This seems like a good way to solve this issue: ARIN would increase IPv4 maintenance fees, and with that finance a "buy back" program from legacy holders. The address space would then be shared with the other RIRs in accordance with 2007-27.
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv4 Resource Distribution After IANA Free Pool Exhaustion -- ARIN AC BoF
- Next message: [ppml] No Webcast of IPv4 Free Pool BoF today
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list