[ppml] [sig-policy] Policy Proposal: IPv4TransferPolicy Proposal
Stephen Sprunk
stephen at sprunk.org
Tue Feb 12 11:59:56 EST 2008
- Previous message: [ppml] [sig-policy] Policy Proposal: IPv4 TransferPolicy Proposal
- Next message: [ppml] [sig-policy] Policy Proposal: IPv4TransferPolicy Proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thus spake <michael.dillon at bt.com> > In fact, is there currently a barrier to doing an ERX style > transfer? ERX was only for legacy registrations, which were all on convenient classful boundaries, limited in number, and in specific /8s that were already a mess from a DNS perspective; supporting an unknown number of transfers on arbitrary boundaries in any /8 is a rather more complex and painful undertaking. > For instance, imagine that a European ISP built a network in the USA, > using RIPE addresses, They're not supposed to do that; while it's not written into the policies anywhere I can find, it seems to be accepted that addresses are only to be used in the region of the RIR that issued them, minus incidental use like a large network on one continent dropping a handful of routers at IXes on another continent. If you've got actual customers in a given region, you should be getting addresses for them from the respective RIR, not the one where your headquarters is arbitrarily located this year. How well the above is enforced in practice, I can't tell; my guess is that we don't see much "registry shopping" today because most members of the community voluntarily do the right thing, the RIRs' policies are largely equivalent, and the RIRs' staffs are doing a bit of enforcement via internal policies _not_ voted on by their members. This probably needs fixing, but it doesn't seem urgent at this point. > Assume that the ownership transfer of IP addresses within RIPE has > already been done. Can this ISP transfer these addresses to ARIN > under current rules? > > If not, why not? What are the specific barriers? If this was > a US incorporated owner would it make a difference? AFAIK, there is no process in place to transfer non-legacy blocks from one RIR to another. If you have addresses in a /8 delegated by IANA to a given RIR, status quo is that they'll be registered with that RIR forever. Perhaps that needs to be changed, but we'd need a global policy to do it and AFAIK there is no such proposal on the table at present -- and we're past the deadline for any new proposals in the current ARIN cycle. S Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking
- Previous message: [ppml] [sig-policy] Policy Proposal: IPv4 TransferPolicy Proposal
- Next message: [ppml] [sig-policy] Policy Proposal: IPv4TransferPolicy Proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list