[ppml] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
Howard, W. Lee
Lee.Howard at stanleyassociates.com
Mon Feb 11 11:56:29 EST 2008
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'm not commenting on the merit of the proposal, but on its clarity. > 8.4.3 Conditions on the IPv4 address block to be transferred: > > * The IPv4 block must comply with applicable ARIN requirements, > including minimum allocation size (i.e. NRPM 4.2.2., 4.2.4., > 4.3.2., 4.3.6.). However, an IPv4 allocation or > assignment of /24 > or larger, but smaller than the current minimum > allocation size, > may be transferred as a whole resource, but may not be > subdivided. Is this intended to mean swamp space can remain swampy, but other space can't be subdivided in /24? It looks like it says the block must meet minimum transfer size, unless it's a /24 or larger. > * The transferor may retain one contiguous address range out of > their original allocation or assignment for their own use, and > transfer the other contiguous address range. If the > address range > to be transferred consists of multiple non-aggregatable CIDR > blocks, each may be transferred to a different transferee. The > retained address range may not be further subdivided or > transferred for a period of 12 months. I can transfer my hypothetical /16 as 254 /24s and keep one for myself? Lee
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list