[ppml] "Who's afraid of IPv4 address depletion? Apparently no one."
Michael Sinatra
michael at rancid.berkeley.edu
Sat Feb 9 19:13:35 EST 2008
- Previous message: [ppml] "Who's afraid of IPv4 address depletion? Apparently no one."
- Next message: [ppml] "Who's afraid of IPv4 address depletion? Apparently no one."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nathan.Nieblas at quebecorworld.com wrote: > Is the reserved Class E address space not being considered? Would it take > to much effort vs. the effort of implementing IPv6? It is being considered in some corners for things like private addressing[1]. IMO, to make that space useful for globally-routable unicast services, it would take enough work and extend the life of the IPv4 free pool for a short enough time that our efforts are better spent in deploying IPv6. michael [1]http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wilson-class-e-01.txt
- Previous message: [ppml] "Who's afraid of IPv4 address depletion? Apparently no one."
- Next message: [ppml] "Who's afraid of IPv4 address depletion? Apparently no one."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list