[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-3: Community Networks IPv6 Allocation - Revised
Member Services
info at arin.net
Mon Aug 18 13:04:50 EDT 2008
- Previous message: [arin-ppml] Whois Integrity Policy Proposal -- What is proof and how big is the problem?
- Next message: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-4: Minimum Allocation in the Caribbean Region - Revised
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Policy Proposal "2008-3: Community Networks IPv6 Allocation" has been revised. This proposal is open for discussion on this mailing list and will be on the agenda at the upcoming ARIN Public Policy Meeting. The current policy proposal text is provided below and is also available at: http://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2008_3.html Regards, Member Services American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) ## * ## Policy Proposal 2008-3 Community Networks IPv6 Allocation Author: Joshua King Date: 18 August 2008 Proposal type: new Policy term: permanent Policy statement: [Add Section 2.8 to the NRPM.] 2.8 Community Network A community network is a generic reference to any network that is operated by a group of people living in a particular local area organized for the purposes of delivery or provision of free or low-cost network services to the residents of an incorporated or unincorporated regional municipality, city, town, village, rural municipality, township, county, district or other municipality or other such geographic space, however designated. Legal responsibility for the network as a whole must be held by an organization either possessing federal non-profit status or fiscally sponsored by a non-profit organization. [Modify 6.5.8.1b as follows.] b. qualify for an IPv4 assignment or allocation from ARIN under the IPv4 policy currently in effect or be a Community Network as defined in Section 2.8, with allocation criteria defined in section 6.5.9. [Add Section 6.5.9 to the NRPM.] 6.5.9 Community Network Allocations 6.5.9.1. Initial assignment size Organizations defined as Community Networks under section 2.8 are eligible to receive a direct assignment. The minimum size of the assignment is /48. Organizations requesting a larger assignment must provide documentation of the characteristics of the Community Network's size and architecture that require the use of additional subnets. An HD-Ratio of .94 with respect to subnet utilization within the network must be met for all assignments larger than a /48. These assignments shall be made from a distinctly identified prefix and shall be made with a reservation for growth of at least a /44. This reservation may be assigned to other organizations later, at ARIN's discretion. 6.5.9.2. Subsequent assignment size Additional assignments may be made when the need for additional subnets is justified. Justification will be determined based on a detailed plan of the network's architecture and the .94 HD-Ratio metric. When possible, assignments will be made from an adjacent address block. 6.5.9.3. Number of customers Community Networks seeking an allocation must demonstrate that they provide for a user base of at least 100 through connectivity to homes and businesses, public facilities, public access points, or mobile users. Community Networks with user bases of under 200 must also submit a plan for doubling their service base over the next year. Rationale: There are currently a number of projects globally that aim to develop community network infrastructure and related technologies. These are usually coordinated by volunteer-run, grassroots organizations which lack many of the resources of traditional internet service providers and other network operators. They have diverse goals, including public policy, software development, and implementation of community services and resources. Many of them provide services free of charge, and thus lack any paying user base. However, in order to create and maintain community networks that are often composed of hundreds if not thousands of inexpensive consumer-grade network devices, a significant amount of address space will be required. Current-generation workarounds to this problem, such as NAT, not only make it difficult to develop next-generation decentralized network technology by segmenting the community's architecture from the Internet as a whole, but will cease to be as viable a stopgap as the Internet moves towards IPv6 integration. Community-based, volunteer-run organizations that are operated with an eye towards the public good often do not have the resources to qualify as an LIR under the current policy. They are often multi-homed networks utilizing multiple, relatively inexpensive consumer-grade internet uplinks and lacking the funds to meet the qualifications for an IPv4 allocation, but which wish an avenue to develop future IPv6 capability for their constituent users. By establishing a procedure by which these organizations can seek to acquire the resources they require for further development, ARIN can reach out to this active community and establish a small but definite space for them in the future of Internet. Timetable for implementation: Immediate.
- Previous message: [arin-ppml] Whois Integrity Policy Proposal -- What is proof and how big is the problem?
- Next message: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-4: Minimum Allocation in the Caribbean Region - Revised
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list