[ppml] FW: No transfer policies are needed
Bill Woodcock
woody at pch.net
Mon Apr 21 09:33:44 EDT 2008
- Previous message: [ppml] FW: No transfer policies are needed
- Next message: [ppml] FW: No transfer policies are needed
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 michael.dillon at bt.com wrote: > To date, I believe only one BoT member has disclosed their > financial interests in organizations holding legacy allocations. Michael, this is simply untrue. John Curran answered this the last time you asserted it, on March 5. Bill Manning and I are the only two board members with ownership in corporations with legacy assignments, and we've both disclosed that publicly, and explained that that's why we recused ourselves from discussion of this issue on the board and, moreover, agreed sight-unseen to be bound by the legacy RSA, whatever it might turn out to be, before it had even been drafted. The reason no other board member has disclosed any legacy holdings is because they don't have any, and have nothing to disclose. -Bill
- Previous message: [ppml] FW: No transfer policies are needed
- Next message: [ppml] FW: No transfer policies are needed
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list