[ppml] Proposal for the creation of a working group.
Raul Echeberria
raul at lacnic.net
Tue Apr 8 19:10:25 EDT 2008
- Previous message: [ppml] ARIN XXI Agenda Updates
- Next message: [ppml] Proposal for the creation of a working group.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
For those that are following the ARIN XXI meeting, this is the email that I mentioned in the mike. The frist goal of a working group like this would be to explore the feasibility and/or convience of this kind of policies. If somebody from ARIN community want to become involved in an initiative like this, please contact me. Raúl At 10:17 a.m. 09/10/2007, Raul Echeberria wrote: >Dear all: > >I would like to share with all of you this >proposal. Since it is not a policy proposal, I >don't know really how to proceed, but I guess >that it is enough to send it to the list. > >This proposal doesn't intend to substitute the >Policy Proposal "2007-16 IPv4 Soft Landing" and >is not incompatible with the discussion of this >proposal and/or its eventual adoption. > >I will send the same proposal to the others RIRs' poilicy lists. > >Raúl > > >========================================== > >Proposal for the creation of a cross-regions working group > > > >Some proposals have been submitted through some >RIRs policy development process, which focus on >the gradual modification of the requirements for >receiving IPv4 addresses as the pool of unallocated IPv4 addresses diminishes. > >Most or all proposals which have been made appear >to be incomplete and ineffective if approved in >only one region. Therefore, it is proposed the >creation of a working group made up by two >appropriate respected individuals active in the >policy process within each regions community. >These ten individuals would work on one or more >joint proposals that could then be processed in >every region according to their corresponding policy development processes. > >The objective of the working group would not be >to produce proposals for global policies, but >proposals to be sumbitted to every RIRs. The >conclusion could be, of course, that the >proposals should be different in each region. > >Since the proposal (if there are any) should go >later through each Policy Development Process, >there will not be any impact of this proposal in >the independence of each region to adopt the >poclicies that are considered more convenients. > >Naturally, the proposals that have already been >presented in relation to this issue would be >important input for this working group, one >possible conclusion being that these proposals >contain the best possible policies and should be >presented. Without this level of coordination, it >will be difficult to obtain proposals to be >submitted for discussion in all regions with >reasonable chances of success. One member of >each RIRs staff would also participate in this working >group, in the capacity of observers, so as to >provide all the support, advice and information >that the group deems necessary. IANA will also be >invited to appoint up to two persons to the working >group in the same condition of observers. > >The working schedule would be defined by the >group itself, but it should be anticipated that >the proposals, in case it is decided they are >needed, be presented for their discussion as soon as possible. > >The following are some of the ideas that have >already been presented either formally or >informally and that will be available for the >consideration of this working group (but not limited to) : > > >· Increasing the requirements for >receiving additional allocations as IANAs >central pool of addresses diminishes. >· Adding to the current requirements the >requirement to develop the availability of IPv6 infrastructure. >· Reducing the sizes of the blocks that >are allocated as IANAs central pool of addresses diminishes. >· Including within the gradual increase of >restrictions the requirement that when one RIR >runs out of addresses the others will >automatically be moved to a more conservative >phase in order to minimize RIR shopping. > >=============== > >_______________________________________________ >PPML >You are receiving this message because you are >subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy >Mailing List (PPML at arin.net). >Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml >Please contact the ARIN Member Services >Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
- Previous message: [ppml] ARIN XXI Agenda Updates
- Next message: [ppml] Proposal for the creation of a working group.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list