[ppml] RFC 1744 and its discontents
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Mon Apr 7 23:07:23 EDT 2008
- Previous message: [ppml] RFC 1744 and its discontents
- Next message: [ppml] RFC 1744 and its discontents
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:08:29AM +1000, Geoff Huston wrote: > Tom Vest wrote: > > "Address Ownership Considered Fatal" > > Yakhov Rekter > > March 31, 1995 > > > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-online-proceedings/95apr/area.and.wg.reports/ops/cidrd/cidrd.rekhter.slides.ps > > ... as far as I can see both RFC1744 and the Rekhter document both are supportive of a lease concept (Corollary 3, page 12 of the Rekhter presentation, RFC1744, section 3, para 4). > > thanks, > > Geoff that would be two points of view - neither of which seemed to make it into RFC 2050. UNLESS you consider the concept of a lease as a narrowly focused, specific business plan implementation of a larger, more broadly scoped concept of bounded stewardship. --bill
- Previous message: [ppml] RFC 1744 and its discontents
- Next message: [ppml] RFC 1744 and its discontents
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list