[ppml] Revision to 2008-3
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Wed Apr 2 05:36:10 EDT 2008
- Previous message: [ppml] Revision to 2008-3
- Next message: [ppml] Revision to 2008-3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I absolutely oppose the idea of including organizations > organized under 501(c)5, or equivalent, for this purpose, Aha! We have a lawyer on the list. Could you kindly take a look at the Income Tax Act and let us know which sections apply and do not apply, to your criteria for which non-profits should be eligible for special treatment? By the way, I am opposed to any special treatment at all for non-profits. If ARIN is going to issue allocations for the use of a single geographic community, then it should b e irrelevant whether the recipient of the allocation is a profit-making or non-profit organization. The key criteria should be that the addresses are to be used within the community. In fact, I would be in favor of ARIN allocating addresses to a community without any recipient at all. In that case, the reassignments would be done by ARIN or some agent of ARIN. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message: [ppml] Revision to 2008-3
- Next message: [ppml] Revision to 2008-3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list