[ppml] IPv6 flawed?
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Mon Sep 17 14:35:11 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv6 flawed?
- Next message: [ppml] IPv6 flawed?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Connected networks need communication between admins > for smooth connectivity during transitions.. There are parallels here with the way people renumber nameservers. Many sites on the Internet will have your old address cached for some period of time. In some cases, a long-running application could have it cached for months. And if you make use of DNS slave servers at another organization, they have your address hard-coded in their config. A good way to renumber nameservers is to a) notify slave server admins, b) turn on the new addressing, c) maintain the old addressing on you master servers for a transition period, d) monitor the master server's traffic, e) followup any sites using the old address for too long, and finally f) stop using the old addresses. IPv6 only handles steps b and f automatically. However, the fact that IPv6 has this two-step process built-in, is new for the base level network renumbering of routers, servers etc. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv6 flawed?
- Next message: [ppml] IPv6 flawed?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list