[ppml] IPv6 flawed?

 How will you know their announcement is ULA-C to filter it?  Are you
saying that you will build a statement for every ULA-C for each ASN in
the world into your edge access-list?  Or is there some aggregatable
filter list I am unaware of?  Even if it were as few as 500 filter
statements, I would not be happy to have to extend an access list that
far, and I suspect the number of statements required would far outrun
that humble number.

Feel free to educate me, I want to learn.

Kevin


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net] On 
> Behalf Of Iljitsch van Beijnum
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 10:38 AM
> To: Paul Vixie
> Cc: ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [ppml] IPv6 flawed?
> 
> On 17-sep-2007, at 17:32, Paul Vixie wrote:
> 
> >> Hmmm...Now...what was that long drawn out conversation....that 
> >> addressed private space in a good way.....oh yeah!  ULA-C!
> 
> > ULA-C is apparently quite dead, since noone whose job includes 
> > defending the DFZ from explosion believes that ULA-C would be as 
> > "local" as ULA.
> 
> Riiiight... that must be why several people told me that PI 
> is a good alternative for ULA-C, people holding a PI block 
> will of course never be tempted to announce THAT.
> 
> I'll be filtering ULA-Cs that people announce, or they'll be 
> giving me enough money that I'm happy to accept the 
> advertisements. No problem either way.
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to 
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml Please contact 
> the ARIN Member Services Help Desk at info at arin.net if you 
> experience any issues.
>