[ppml] IPv6 flawed?

yeah...and I still wonder...if that is more a fear than anything.  I would like to think the community has learned some leassons.  And then there was always the counter debate that the number of true offenders was small but they were just large offenders.  Which makes me wonder why they arnt just publicly humiliated into doing things right.  And I question, if they would do the same thing with ULA or actually use that one right with all the publicity its gotten.

So I am still left thinking that it should be used correctly that way.

Cheers!
Marla

-----Original Message-----
From: vixie at vix.com [mailto:vixie at vix.com]On Behalf Of Paul Vixie
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 8:32 AM
To: Azinger, Marla
Cc: Brian Johnson; Ted Mittelstaedt; Kevin Kargel; ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [ppml] IPv6 flawed? 


> Hmmm...Now...what was that long drawn out conversation....that addressed
> private space in a good way.....oh yeah!  ULA-C!

ULA-C is apparently quite dead, since noone whose job includes defending
the DFZ from explosion believes that ULA-C would be as "local" as ULA.