[ppml] IPv6 flawed?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


>>>>> "Christopher" == Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow at gmail.com> writes:
    Christopher> There have been more than a few talks/panels/discussions of shim6/ipv6
    Christopher> at previous nanog, arin, IETF meetings. The situation is far from this
    Christopher> simple for production enterprise networks. It's even less simple for
    Christopher> ISP-type networks.

  ISPs are not supposed to use shim6.

    Christopher> SHIM6 seems to fit certain niches, I'm not sure that enterprise
    Christopher> multi-homing nor 'provider' multihoming are them. Content provider
    Christopher> multihoming seems even less likely to use shim6...

  if it doesn't solve enterprise multihoming, then there is a problem.
  The rest of the uses are not really in scope.

- -- 
Michael Richardson <mcr at xdsinc.net>
XDS Inc, Ottawa, ON             
Personal: http://www.sandelman.ca/mcr/ 


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iQDVAwUBRuqg3+0sRu40D6vCAQL8NAYAhkCWXWX42ugPlNZL+lKbznkMwzScIpJ0
Xf+dpC/OOm50MbzAzX39xXopD6Fg1dd/yxZQuQeZv7BaTpnycc2W3oIzQpCjRI21
X6TFHORPk8nUE8dvSa78LObEus+3x0AQLxmTxqnmNWqvt1Ri5Foup4uz5sLjWC9m
fkSR4tUI/jp9O6OptBfwg9GN9v06o1J39Ni6HAlupd6rKQqnsJ8xvHOVLjds7tZX
nMIaz42joGGQrQHRetMuz9VmC7eryEeZ
=ar3A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----