[ppml] Policy Proposal -- Eliminate Lame Server policy
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Wed Sep 12 09:58:26 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal -- Eliminate Lame Server policy
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal -- Eliminate Lame Server policy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> However, my fear is that without section 7.2 ARIN staff will > feel they have no authority to police DNS delegations. With section 7.2, my fear is that ARIN staff will feel that they cannot take any action with regard to in-addr.arpa delegations unless it meets the letter of the policy. By removing this from policy, staff will be free to take any reasonable actions under the direction of management and the board without fear of contravening ARIN policy. This is an ops issue, not a policy issue. As for policing, I hope that ARIN staff never police DNS delegations. I would like to seem them audit such delegations, and maintain contact with DNS ops people inside the various organizations. I would like to see them offer free in-addr.arpa services to orgs with ARIN allocations/assignments and I would like to see them track which orgs actively refuse the free services so as not to pester them every 6 months or so. But I would not like to see any policing and especially not any policing which assumes that there is one right way for the Internet and therefore all IP network users must toe that line. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal -- Eliminate Lame Server policy
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal -- Eliminate Lame Server policy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list