[ppml] Comments on ARIN's reverse DNS mapping policy
Robert Bonomi
bonomi at mail.r-bonomi.com
Tue Sep 11 02:49:46 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Comments on ARIN's reverse DNS mapping policy
- Next message: [ppml] Comments on ARIN's reverse DNS mapping policy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 02:19:40 -0400 (EDT) > From: Sam Weiler <weiler at tislabs.com> > Subject: Re: [ppml] Comments on ARIN's reverse DNS mapping policy > > I'm wondering if it would be sufficient to have ARIN act _far_ more > swiftly to remove the lame delegations. While that wouldn't get good > PTR records published, it should cure the long timeout problem. Does an inompletely populated zone constitute a 'lame' server? Does a zone with _no_ data other than a SOA constitute a 'lame' server? Is a server that fails to return NXDOMAIN in a _timely_ manner for something it doesn't know about a 'lame' server? It's not at all clear to me that requiring faser action for 7.2 addresses any of those situations. My understading of a lame server is one that is listed (elsewhere) as 'authoritative' for a zone, but does NOT report itself as athoritative when queried. Policy is that the zone has to 'be there'. I haven't found anything that says abot 'if' or 'what' has to be in the zone -- beyond the SOA that makes it 'authoritative', that is.
- Previous message: [ppml] Comments on ARIN's reverse DNS mapping policy
- Next message: [ppml] Comments on ARIN's reverse DNS mapping policy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list