[ppml] IPv6 addressing plans
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Tue Sep 4 14:09:21 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv6 addressing plans
- Next message: [ppml] IPv6 addressing plans
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 4-sep-2007, at 14:15, <michael.dillon at bt.com> <michael.dillon at bt.com> wrote: > Does anyone have any reasoning why a network spanning two or more > of the > RIR regions, should or should not get separate ISP allocations from > each > region? Well obviously arbitrary administrativia trumps using up routing table slots. </sarcasm> Although in your case it doesn't matter much because by the time all the IPv6 space is sliced in /22s (or /23s) we can route a million of them without any trouble. > We've just received an IPv6 /22 from RIPE Yeah, they should stop doing that. > based solely on projections in our European network infrastructure. Especially based on projections that may or may not pan out.
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv6 addressing plans
- Next message: [ppml] IPv6 addressing plans
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list