[ppml] IPv6 assignment - proposal for change to nrpm

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net]On Behalf Of
>Robert Bonomi
>Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 6:59 PM
>To: ppml at arin.net
>Subject: Re: [ppml] IPv6 assignment - proposal for change to nrpm
>
>
>> From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm at ipinc.net>
>> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:38:54 -0700
>> Subject: Re: [ppml] IPv6 assignment - proposal for change to nrpm
>>
>> Any contract that obligates you to conceal something illegal is
>> unenforceable.
>> You can ask any lawyer that does whistleblower work about this and get
>> PLENTY of cites.  Unless those /8's are legacy, that NDA is not
>enforcable
>> against you because those companies are illegally breaking their RSA with
>> ARIN.
>
>*YOU* are wrong.
>
>"breach of contract" is not a criminal matter. It is a civil tort _only_.
>public disclosure of tortuous behavior _is_ ationable under an NDA.
>WITHOUT 'whistleblower'protetions.
>

Groan.  Not again.  Please review the following:

http://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html

4.2.2  Initial allocations to ISPs.  In fact, this entire page.  If
an org is purely legacy, and they are getting their first allocation under
RSA,
if they claim they have met "efficient utilization" for their first
allocation, they are committing fraud if they have under utilized /8's
floating around.

http://www.arin.net/registration/guidelines/ipv4_add_alloc.html

If an org requests additional space, and doesen't have efficient utilization
of existing space, this is also fraud.

You can have both fraud and breach of contract for the same action,
of course.

Fraud is criminal not civil.  Whistleblower protections apply.

Ted