[ppml] IPv6 PI to legacy IPv4 holders

[William Herrin]

On 10/18/07, briand at ca.afilias.info <briand at ca.afilias.info> wrote:
> I think you are concerned about *requiring* ASNs; my proposal addresses
> on the additional *ability* to get PI IPv6 for orgs that don't qualify under
> other criteria.
>
> Under the conditions you describe, do those orgs not qualify either under
> existing policy, or based on the proposed "legacy + efficient utilization"
> policy?

Brian,

Orgs efficiently using private AS numbers would qualify for IPv6 PI
under 2007-21. As I understand your suggested modification, they would
not qualify since they don't hold an ARIN assigned AS number. They
would qualify for an AS number so they could get that first and then
get IPv6 PI space, but why make an extra hurdle and spend an extra AS
number with extra record-keeping?

Regards,
Bill Herrin



-- 
William D. Herrin                  herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr.                        Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004