[ppml] Statements of support for the proposals
Kirk Ismay
captain at netidea.com
Wed Oct 17 14:43:42 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Statements of support for the proposals
- Next message: [ppml] Posting of Legacy RSA and FAQ
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
William Herrin wrote: > Hi folks, > > I thought it might be helpful to compile statements of support or > opposition for each of the pending policy proposals in a single > message along with a brief reason why/why not. I encourage others to > do the same. > Here's my $0.02: > 2006-7 Changes to IPv6 initial allocation criteria I support 2006-7. I prefer the wording proposed in Annex B in the staff assessment. > 2007-13: Removal of ISP Immediate Need from End-User I support 2007-13. > 2007-14: Resource Review Process I support 2007-14. > 2007-15: Authentication of Legacy Resources I OPPOSE 2007-15 as written. I do like the proposed Legacy RSA. I would be supportive if the 3rd paragraph were revised as follows: "No changes shall be made to legacy resource records which are not covered by a registration services agreement after December 31, 2008" This change gives a minimum of 1 year of outreach efforts. > 2007-16: IPv4 Soft Landing I support 2007-16. > 2007-17: Legacy Outreach and Partial Reclamation I OPPOSE 2007-17. The Legacy RSA proposes additional benefits for the return of IP resources, which address this issue. > 2007-18: Global Policy for the Allocation of the Remaining IPv4 > Address Space I OPPOSE 2007-18, in favor of 2007-23. > 2007-19: IANA Policy for Allocation of ASN Blocks to RIRs I support 2007-19 - as it codifies the existing practice (as described in the Rationale) > 2007-21: PIv6 for legacy holders with RSA and efficient use I support 2007-21. > 2007-22: Expand timeframe of Additional Requests I OPPOSE 2007-22, though I have mixed feelings about it. On the one hand, I like the idea of harmonizing policy with other RIRs. On the other, the policy may have negative effects on IPv4 conservation efforts, which far outweigh any benefits of harmonization. > 2007-23: End Policy for IANA IPv4 allocations to RIRs I support 2007-23. > 2007-24: IPv6 Assignment Guidelines I support 2007-24. Simple is better. > 2007-25: IPv6 Policy Housekeeping I support 2007-25, clarification is a good thing. > 2007-26 Lame Delegation Policy I support 2007-26. -- Sincerely, Kirk Ismay System Administrator -- Net Idea 201-625 Front Street Nelson, BC V1L 4B6 P:250-352-3512 | F:250-352-9780 | TF:1-888-352-3512 Check out our brand new website! www.netidea.com
- Previous message: [ppml] Statements of support for the proposals
- Next message: [ppml] Posting of Legacy RSA and FAQ
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list