[ppml] [arin-discuss] Legacy Legal Defense Fund and LegacyRegistry
Stephen Sprunk
stephen at sprunk.org
Wed Oct 10 16:59:38 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] [arin-discuss] Legacy Legal Defense Fund and Legacy Registry
- Next message: [ppml] [arin-discuss] Legacy Legal Defense Fund and Legacy Registry
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thus spake "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" <mksmith at adhost.com> > If a separate registry was formed, it seems to me that the > funding for this registry would be accounted for from within the > membership, i.e. the legacy address holders participating in the > registry. I can't think of a reason why ARIN would be responsible > for these costs. I am assuming that Dean's theory is that ARIN promised to provide registry services for legacy holders, therefore it would fund a separate registry to do so. However, doing so would impose additional costs due to the separation of operations, and therefore it doesn't make fiscal sense. In reality, the creation of such a registry (if it were possible) would release ARIN from its moral obligation and need to be funded by its registrants. Note that these folks are the subset of ARIN registrants who have largely refused to pay ARIN money for the services they receive today, so I fail to see how an alternate registry, without fee-paying registrants, would be able to operate. > As a Member, it concerns me that the legacy holders only pay > $100.00 into the coffers, although I understand the reasoning. Actually, the vast majority of them pay nothing. Only a very few, AFAIK, have joined the ARIN process and pay the $100/yr maintenance fee. The remainder get their registration services for free, funded by the (mostly non-legacy) fee-paying members of the community. Those folks're getting a free ride. Frankly, it'd be a lot cheaper for them to join PPML and shout down any policy proposal that would adversely affect them (which costs exactly $0) than it would be to form any sort of "legal defense fund" -- which is a misleading name itself, since that term is commonly used for "defense" against lawsuits, and there is no indication that ARIN has any intent of suing anybody. What it really is is a "legal attack fund", i.e. a way for legacy holders to pool their money to sue ARIN. S Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking
- Previous message: [ppml] [arin-discuss] Legacy Legal Defense Fund and Legacy Registry
- Next message: [ppml] [arin-discuss] Legacy Legal Defense Fund and Legacy Registry
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list