[ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
John Curran
jcurran at istaff.org
Mon Oct 8 20:17:00 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
- Next message: [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 8:08 PM -0400 10/8/07, Dean Anderson wrote: >BTW, Curran has corrected himself: There is indeed no formal statement >on the subject from ARIN counsel. I've asked for a formal statement to >be produced, but haven't heard back whether they will do that. Dean - The request was noted and will be brought before the Board. >The statement from Sprunk to IETF relies on an informal statement of >Counsel and Sprunk omitted significant qualifying context from the >informal statement. The full transcript (including Counsel's response to the question) is available online; you can keep repeating that Steven omitted context but a carefully reading doesn't support that conclusion. /John
- Previous message: [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
- Next message: [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list