[ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
Jeremy H. Griffith
jhg at omsys.com
Thu Oct 4 18:46:10 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
- Next message: [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 15:25:09 -0500, "Stephen Sprunk" <stephen at sprunk.org> wrote: >> Where is this counsel statement? > >http://www.arin.net/meetings/minutes/ARIN_XIX/ppm1_transcript.html#anchor_13 > >"MR. RYAN: I've thought a little bit about what a stick might look like >here. So for example, it's very clear to me that denial of service by ARIN >is legally permitted. In other words, I don't believe we, as the non-profit >trying to carry out the community's wishes, have a duty to provide free >services for legacy address holders. And the denial of those free services >to legacy address holders pursuant to their lack of agreement is perfectly >permitted, in my judgment, as a matter of law." Perhaps not, but it would put ARIN right in the middle of this ICANN issue: http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=302552 It would certainly ensure continued full employment for attorneys... ;-) --Jeremy
- Previous message: [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
- Next message: [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list