[ppml] Individuals vs. organizations in the public policyprocess
Wettling, Fred
Fred.Wettling at Bechtel.com
Sat Nov 17 12:27:45 EST 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Individuals vs. organizations in the public policy process
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal Name: IPv6 Assignment Size Reduction
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
The ARIN policy discussions are not limited to individuals. "Policy development is an open and transparent process. Anyone may participate in the process -- a prior relationship as an ARIN member or customer is not a requirement..." Link: http://www.arin.net/policy/index.html Organizations pay the ARIN fees, receive the vast majority of the addresses allocated by ARIN, and are subject to the ARIN policies. As Scott mentioned, the ARIN member organizations each get one vote. PPML participants should consider that individuals speaking on behalf of their organization may have gone through an internal vetting process before posting a note. This will often include internal discussions/debates/education and an enterprise impact analysis of the policy proposal. >From my perspective the organizational affiliation is useful when a PPML message is posted as a position of the organization. It helps provide additional context for the comment. Regards - Fred -----Original Message----- From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Scott Leibrand Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 5:57 PM To: Stephen Sprunk Cc: ARIN PPML Subject: Re: [ppml] Individuals vs. organizations in the public policyprocess Stephen Sprunk wrote: > Thus spake Steve Bertrand > > For the record then, and given what you said about the NAY/YAY consideration at the meetings, myself, and the company that I work for strongly oppose this policy. > > Not to pick on Steve in particular, but this is the second time this week I've seen corporate endorsement of a policy position. My understanding is that ARIN, like the IETF, is a community of _people_ with opinions and that corporate affiliations are for identification only. > > Can someone from the BoT or AC clarify whether I've got that right? Speaking as an individual (I'm not on the AC yet anyway), I think that's correct, as far as the public policy process goes. As a matter of free speech, I think everyone is free to speak for their company if they wish, but that has no more weight than speaking for themselves. Where companies (ARIN members) matter is when it comes to voting: each ARIN member (ORG ID) get just one designated member representative, and hence one vote for AC and BoT seats. However, it's important to distinguish between such elections (and other actions taken during the ARIN member meeting), and the public policy process (and public policy meeting), which operates by consensus of individual participants. -Scott
- Previous message: [ppml] Individuals vs. organizations in the public policy process
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal Name: IPv6 Assignment Size Reduction
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list