[ppml] Effects of explosive routing table growth on ISP behavior
Per Heldal
heldal at eml.cc
Fri Nov 2 11:12:45 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Effects of explosive routing table growth on ISP behavior
- Next message: [ppml] Effects of explosive routing table growth on ISP behavior
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 14:23 +0000, michael.dillon at bt.com wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 08:54 -0500, Brian Johnson wrote: > > > MY ENTIRE POINT IS THAT ARIN NEEDS TO STAY OUT OF ROUTING POLICY! > > > Is it just RIRs that have no business being involved in > > routing-policy or do you resist any coordination of > > routing-policies between DFZ operators? Suppose a market > > emerges and it must be regulated, how do you enforce > > regulations without a stick? If the RIRs can't advise > > operators on routing-policies, who can? > > This is a silly comment. The RIRs have no business in routing > policy because they do not have the expertise, and the true > stakeholders in member companies are not involved in the RIRs. > The RIRs have no competent advice to give an ISP on routing > policy. > Between the lines, maybe that's exactly what I indicated that has to change. There should be plenty of routing competence combined within the organisations represented in the ARIN community. I never argued that ARIN itself has the knowledge. They can only mediate community-member's contributions as defined by the community they serve. > That said, there is nothing wrong with RIRs mediating some > coordination of routing policies between DFZ operators, but > this must be done, first and foremost, by getting the routing > policy stakeholders involved in the process. If they don't buy-in, > then it won't work. > > And please don't send me a list of the few PPML participants who > also happen to have design authority in their networks. I know > that there are a few such people, but the point is that RIR policy > is being set, for the most part, by people who do not design their > companies' networks or set their companies' routing policy. As said above; if that is so, maybe it'll have to change? Or do we have to establish a completely new organisation with the authorisation to even get heavy-handed should it be necessary? As was said in ARIN and RIPE meetings in the last weeks the choice may stand between strict industry self-regulation of heavy-handed 3rd party regulators which may be even less educated than today's RIR contributors. //per
- Previous message: [ppml] Effects of explosive routing table growth on ISP behavior
- Next message: [ppml] Effects of explosive routing table growth on ISP behavior
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list