[ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Leo Bicknell
bicknell at ufp.org
Thu May 31 22:01:56 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In a message written on Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:01:35PM -0400, Azinger, Marla wrote: > I am a little surprised at Leo's comment. Mainly because last > July I started attending IETF conferences on behalf of the ARIN AC > (and he is on the AC). I applaud your efforts and willingness to attend the IETF meetings and try and make progress. I absolutely think the solution needs to be done in the IETF, and not ad-hoc by vendors or tacked on by the RIR or operator community. Those who have the time and skill should attend and contribute. However, I'm worried that the IETF needs to shake things up a bit. I had to go back to the transcript (http://www.arin.net/meetings/minutes/ARIN_XIX/ppm1_transcript.html#anchor_12), but here's my worry. The various working groups are "working on": CIDR Boundary, Aggregation Slicing, Metro, Map and Encap, LISP, eFIT, Shim6 If you believe Geoff Huston's latest information (http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/) 13-Mar-2010 is the date. So we have somewhere between 2 and 3 years before there's likely to be a huge upswell in IPv6 deployment (maybe shorter). If I were at the IETF, or for that matter a vendor, I'd feel some pressure to step it up, hold double meetings, and get this problem solved ASAP. Otherwise my prediction is we run out of IPv4 space, people start using IPv6 like crazy, the operators make up the rules as they go along, and by the time the dust settles no one will see a point in any of the above solutions because "it's up and working" and none will see the light of day, ever. Once someone has their PI prefix in the global table do you think they will care of Shim6 ever comes to be? -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20070531/d6273d5c/attachment.bin
- Previous message: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list