[ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Jeroen Massar
jeroen at unfix.org
Thu May 31 18:04:24 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Bicknell wrote: [..] > I think the ARIN board needs to issue a second statement aimed at the > IETF: I think that instead of complaining, you should try to participate in the IETF process, which, like the RIR processes, are completely open. Several people from the IETF have extended their arms already several times in the direction of the RIR's and NANOG, there have even been debates about this. That you did not participate in any of these things in the last 10 years, tsja... Don't complain when you didn't try to do anything about it yourself. Greets, Jeroen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 311 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20070531/58b592c6/attachment.bin
- Previous message: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list