[ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Paul_Vixie at isc.org
Paul_Vixie at isc.org
Tue May 29 10:58:36 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> - IPv6 space is not infinite. It's a 64-72 bit address space. That's > right, subnets with > 256 hosts are very uncommon today, so we've wasted > 64 bits to number 256 things. That makes the space effectively on the > long end 72 bits. according to <http://www.ipv6conference.com/conference.htm>, i gave a talk entitled "DHCPv6 - The Case Against Stateless Autoconfig" at NAV6TF'2005. according to <http://www.isc.org/index.pl?/sw/dhcp/dhcp4_0.php>, there's now code in "alpha test release" status to handle DHCPv6. imho, the days of EUI64 are numbered. at home i'll probably use a /120 for each LAN. at work, we might splurge and use /96's. not that a /56 isn't enough for my house or anything, i just want the sparseful wastitude of the new address bits in IPV6 to all be at the top end. i'm using a /124 for my T1, mostly to make the PTR's easy to write and read. > But more importantly, we have the T-Shirt from this exercise. > Back in the 80's we gave out Class A's. It was the right thing > to do. was it? DEC got 16.0.0.0/8 on the basis of having 130000 employees and something like 10000 offices. they turned in five class B's to get the A. does anybody here think that DEC needed a class A by ARIN's current standards? this was a post-subnet, post-CIDR allocation. > I predict with the current allocation procedures IPv6 will be > "used up" in my lifetime. I also predict the groups today getting > /32's (and larger) will look like the legacy class A holders in > 20 years time. When your doorknob automatically requests a ULA-C > /64 when you bring it home, and your house has 2,000 of them as every > individual system talks to each other we'll be looking at this quite > differently. i include this only so that i can say, i nearly agree. unless we have an IP architecture that splits EID/RID, those doorknobs will not be globally reachable. (not that this is a problem for doorknobs but it might be for microwave ovens or something.)
- Previous message: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list