[ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Rich Emmings
rich at nic.umass.edu
Tue May 29 06:39:26 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
As I mentioned earlier, one of the barriers to getting management buy in on IPv6 is the fact that the standards keep changing, and this is a good example. To use an analogy, the financial boys won't sign off on starting the building until they get a final floor plan. Keep rewriting the spec to try and get it 'perfect' instead of 'good enough' and it'll still be in redesign as the last IPv4 address goes out the door? What problem are we trying to solve here? Is it a valid concern, or are we fighting the last war and blithly ignoring what will be the real problems with IPv6. (Hint, you don't know what it is either. If it's the same problem, it's solved. If it's something you can think of, it's probably being solved. It's novel.)
- Previous message: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list