[ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-6 - Abandoned
Jo Rhett
jrhett at svcolo.com
Wed May 23 14:16:39 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-6 - Abandoned
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-6 - Abandoned
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On May 23, 2007, at 8:42 AM, David Williamson wrote: > I'll second that thought. There's nothing notably dificult about > renumbering, but anywhere you have a direct interaction with another > organization (and vpns are notorious for this), you're likely to > have a > longer time line for making the change. When we need to make major > vpn > changes across our customer base, we assume it will take at least 6-8 > months to complete, just to walk all of them through their own > internal > change processes. > > Never underestimate the sheer inertia of a Fortune 100 company. Ah. So what we have here is a business risk that needs to be properly evaluated and dealt with in the contracts and service provisions with that company. I don't believe that I should be required to put $2-5 million of upgrades into my gear because these needs weren't properly addressed in a company's processes. -- Jo Rhett senior geek Silicon Valley Colocation Support Phone: 408-400-0550
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-6 - Abandoned
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-6 - Abandoned
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list