[ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-6 - Abandoned
Jo Rhett
jrhett at svcolo.com
Wed May 23 14:14:45 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-6 - Abandoned
- Next message: [ppml] ARIN Board Advises Internet Community on Migrationto IPv6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On May 23, 2007, at 8:03 AM, Steven E. Petty wrote: > me: 30-40 vpn's to migrate, mostly with large companies that > move slowly (Ford, Chrysler, Covisint, etc.) and have very limited > flexibility. So while you are doing the hard work of renumbering, I assume you'll also document the process and confirm with all parties how you'll change endpoints in the future, yeah? As I said in a private conversation with Owen Delong, I don't believe that ARIN policy should be designed to allow companies to deliberately drag their feet. Reasonable time to change, absolutely. Even double reasonable time. But I don't think that every provider with big iron should pay millions of dollars in upgrades to allow companies to be inflexible on such a trivial topic. Given that ARIN currently gives longer than either the US Post Office or the telcos do for changes to zip codes and area codes, I struggle to find reason with these arguments. -- Jo Rhett senior geek Silicon Valley Colocation Support Phone: 408-400-0550
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-6 - Abandoned
- Next message: [ppml] ARIN Board Advises Internet Community on Migrationto IPv6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list