[ppml] 240/4
Marshall Eubanks
tme at multicasttech.com
Sat May 5 09:00:25 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] 240/4
- Next message: [ppml] 240/4
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On May 5, 2007, at 12:55 AM, vixie at vix.com wrote: >> How much of the /4 would we need for rfc1918 type space? Would a / >> 6 be >> enough? > > i don't think so. the folks who find 10/8 inadequate want a LOT > LOT LOT > more, not just a little more. In that case, why don't they adopt v6 and be done with it ? Regards Marshall > >> It might be wise to save the rest of it for future, as yet >> unimagined use. >> I wonder if any of the various encapsulation approaches to id/ >> locator split >> could make use of some of that space. > > there is no future for IPv4 nor any reason to reserve or > experiment. we're > just looking for some fumes to breathe while we finally take IPv6 > seriously. > _______________________________________________ > This message sent to you through the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List > (PPML at arin.net). > Manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml
- Previous message: [ppml] 240/4
- Next message: [ppml] 240/4
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list