[ppml] 256/3 was Re: 240/4
Michel Py
michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us
Fri May 4 11:42:13 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] 256/3 was Re: 240/4
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-6 - Abandoned
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alain, > Alain Durand Wrote: > In the spirit of "let's write an RFC to free up some > space and the problem will go away", I would like to > suggest to write an RFC opening up 256/3. I think this is a great idea. Plus, we wouldn't even have to touch the core routing system: all we need is a little patch of the NAT box IPv4 stack to compress the first 33 bits into 32 (STAC, maybe) and we're done. Michel.
- Previous message: [ppml] 256/3 was Re: 240/4
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-6 - Abandoned
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list