[ppml] 240/4
Michel Py
michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us
Thu May 3 23:38:37 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-6 - Abandoned
- Next message: [ppml] 256/3 was Re: 240/4
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David, Thanks for correcting my poor English! > David Conrad wrote: > The cost of redesignating class E space is the cost > of writing an RFC, IANA editing a file, and IANA > publishing that file on IANA's web site. > ..[snip].. > The cost of utilizing class E space will likely be > significantly higher. I don't think the IETF and/or IANA should go forward with redesignating class E, because too many will assume that redesignated == useable at nominal cost. You know, the old "perception is reality" thing. > However, if you judge the cost of utilization high, don't > use it. That is, "Doctor, it hurts when I do this..." That is the kind of irresponsible behavior (redesignating without any concerns of cost or deployability) that the IETF unfortunately has a lot of experience with. Michel.
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-6 - Abandoned
- Next message: [ppml] 256/3 was Re: 240/4
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list