[ppml] Definition of "Existing Known ISP"
Kevin Loch
kloch at kl.net
Thu May 3 18:34:01 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Definition of "Existing Known ISP"
- Next message: [ppml] Definition of "Existing Known ISP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Bicknell wrote: > I'm curious about the public benefit portion of your statement. I > suspect a number of very small ISP's, providing only dynamicly > assigned services, or running ASP type services would much prefer > to be treated by ARIN as end users. For small users, 25% initial > utilization is much larger than a 6 month supply, and in many > situation is cheaper as well. Since the customers are dynamic > and/or they are running server based infrastructure there's no real > benefit to SWIP records, since they are doing to be the point of > contact anyway. > > Where do you see there's benefit, in particular public? I was thinking in terms of publishing reassignment information. Of course for those only assigning > /29 and/or not needing to ever come back for more addresses that isn't a factor. - Kevin
- Previous message: [ppml] Definition of "Existing Known ISP"
- Next message: [ppml] Definition of "Existing Known ISP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list