[ppml] Definition of "Existing Known ISP"
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Thu May 3 04:38:15 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Definition of "Existing Known ISP"
- Next message: [ppml] Definition of "Existing Known ISP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> In general, if you are assigning /32s to customer utilization, but, not > to independently routed segments (e.g. you have a bunch of customers > on the same server each assigned a /32), then, no, you don't meet > ARIN's definition of an ISP. This is news to me. Since when does ARIN tell ISPs what their business model must be? I thought that ARIN's policies required an org to give "technical justification" for IP address assignments and that SSL webhosting counts as a technical justification. Where does the policy prohibit assigning addresses to customers on the same server? --Michael Dillon
- Previous message: [ppml] Definition of "Existing Known ISP"
- Next message: [ppml] Definition of "Existing Known ISP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list