[ppml] 240/4
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Wed May 2 11:38:36 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-1 - Last Call
- Next message: [ppml] 240/4
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 25 Apr 2007, at 23:54, David Conrad wrote: > The cost of redesignating class E space is the cost of writing an > RFC, IANA editing a file, and IANA publishing that file on IANA's > web site. While the first bit may cost a bit of stomach lining and > sanity, I don't think anyone can call the cost anything but very low. Agreed. You volunteering ? :-) > The cost of utilizing class E space will likely be significantly > higher. However, if you judge the cost of utilization high, don't > use it. That is, "Doctor, it hurts when I do this..." If the C in CIDR really does mean classless, then the concept of Class-E ought to start to smell old in 2007. If Vendor fixes hit routing software in 2007, so that class E .. or 240/4 .. was nothing special, then we might just have bought ourselves a little more time, come July 2011 (Geoff's best guess today when IANA's v4 'stock' runs out). -a -- Andy Davidson - ( http://www.andyd.net/ )
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-1 - Last Call
- Next message: [ppml] 240/4
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list