[ppml] Revised Policy Proposal Resource Reclamation
Rich Emmings
rich at nic.umass.edu
Tue May 1 12:01:12 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Revised Policy Proposal Resource Reclamation
- Next message: [ppml] Revised Policy Proposal Resource Reclamation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Stephen Sprunk wrote: > More likely, say we eventually decide -- and counsel agrees -- that policy > applies to folks with legacy assignments. ARIN would then review everyone > with such and apply the "if you applied for space today, what would we give > you" standard. If the org had significantly more than that amount, e.g. > certain universities with a /8 who only really need a /14 or so, they'd get > whacked. Ditto for any org whose space doesn't show up in the global > routing table and who doesn't respond to all reasonable attempts by ARIN to > contact them; the presumption would be the space is no longer in use, not > compliant with current policy, and could be reclaimed. 1) Legacy IP Space assignments were not assigned by ARIN -- do they have control over it, especially, if no RSA was signed (see #3) Likely, in order to give all the RIR's a square shake, it'd have to go back to IANA not ARIN. 2) ARIN provides globally unique numbers without regard to routing, given justifiable need. That it shows up in the routing table is not a requirement, and they explicitly say the space you are getting is not guaranteed routable. In other words, they are a number registry. 3) Universities with a /8 (or other size) who have not asked for space recently, may be worth approaching for reclaimation; those that have added space to their initial allocations, have probably done their justifications recently. Those who ignore ARIN may be legally justifed in doing so -- they did not get their space from ARIN, so have not agreed to the RSA. Does ARIN have legal control over their space? If I were them, I'd legally argue no, and by the time it gets settled, it'd probably moot. (not that I don't question why some early allocations continue to have huge amounts of space, not only /8's. but also multiple /16's and /24's) FWIW, My last count was 12 assigned /8's that weren't in the global routing tables. If we pushed those folks, they'd just announce some small prefix somewhere, and it'd be announced. That the rest of their network is FW'd off from you is their business. Just because they don't announce it today, doesn't mean they aren't entitled to the space. Plus, they probably never signed an ARIN RSA, a few are international, government or multi-national, so ARIN's legal ability to smack down may be a long and rocky road.
- Previous message: [ppml] Revised Policy Proposal Resource Reclamation
- Next message: [ppml] Revised Policy Proposal Resource Reclamation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list