[ppml] In$entive$
Kevin Kargel
kkargel at polartel.com
Thu Mar 22 15:04:11 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] In$entive$
- Next message: [ppml] the transfer proposal was Re: In$entive$
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
________________________________ From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of heh heh Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 12:15 PM To: Owen DeLong Cc: Public Policy Mailing List Subject: Re: [ppml] In$entive$ Actually they can and do. Try getting an allocation (non legacy) updated or transfered without making the payments. The contract that a company signs spells it out that you may not sell the addresses. This is the place where addresses could be reclaimed and current usage is audited. This is were the policing can/should be done. Policing* maybe to strong of a word, open to suggestions. This then opens up to litigation. Aaron * How about "Resource Management", or "Allocation Management" .. or "Resource Administration" Kevin $s/worry/happy,g
- Previous message: [ppml] In$entive$
- Next message: [ppml] the transfer proposal was Re: In$entive$
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list